Hi Lars On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 12:34 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > * Possibly stuff such as > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/support-matrix.html__;!K6dmGCEab4ueJg!lwAwYJi7cUkbX7CUXnOD9i7laj_9xcyafF714u6PO04tu0CYUKDHWBHAy2XD0mvEiA$ > (which is currently GPL-2, > but we could relicense to say GPL-2 and CC-BY-4 if we had to) > The implication is that the sphinx docs would not be fully CC-BY-4, > but the bulk of the pages would be > > * Would we ever include API docs generated from GPLv2 code? E.g. for > safety use-cases? > @Stefano, @Artem: I guess this one is for you. > I suppose if we would have a similar issue for a safety manual > I am also assuming we would want to use sphinx docs and rst to > generate a future safety manual >
Yes, I think we will have to use some API docs in safety related documentation. But I do not see any issue with that because using "description" part of headers in documentation can be treated as "fair use" and thus will not create a license conflict as confirmed in https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SourceCodeInDocumentation -- Artem _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
