Hi,
Title: Please remove the full stop.
On 9/26/19 10:46 AM, hong...@amazon.com wrote:
From: Hongyan Xia <hong...@amazon.com>
Please describe what the patch does and why. For instance, why you do
you replace maddr_to_mfn(map_e) with INVALID_MFN? Why not just removing
the complete call?
Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hong...@amazon.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 4 ++--
xen/common/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
index e964c032f6..3dc2fad987 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
if ( map_e < end )
{
- map_pages_to_xen((unsigned long)__va(map_e),
maddr_to_mfn(map_e),
+ map_pages_to_xen((unsigned long)__va(map_e), INVALID_MFN,
PFN_DOWN(end - map_e), PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
init_boot_pages(map_e, end);
map_e = end;
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
}
if ( s < map_s )
{
- map_pages_to_xen((unsigned long)__va(s), maddr_to_mfn(s),
+ map_pages_to_xen((unsigned long)__va(s), INVALID_MFN,
PFN_DOWN(map_s - s), PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
init_boot_pages(s, map_s);
}
diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
index a00db4c0d9..deeeac065c 100644
--- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
+++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
@@ -2157,7 +2157,7 @@ void *alloc_xenheap_pages(unsigned int order, unsigned
int memflags)
map_pages_to_xen((unsigned long)ret, page_to_mfn(pg),
1UL << order, PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
- return page_to_virt(pg);
+ return ret;
This change looks spurious. Did you intend to do it in a previous patch?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel