On 14.09.2019 10:52, Juergen Gross wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
> +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
> @@ -351,26 +351,10 @@ static void sched_spin_unlock_double(spinlock_t *lock1, 
> spinlock_t *lock2,
>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock1, flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void sched_free_unit(struct sched_unit *unit, struct vcpu *v)
> +static void sched_free_unit_mem(struct sched_unit *unit)
>  {
>      struct sched_unit *prev_unit;
>      struct domain *d = unit->domain;
> -    struct vcpu *vunit;
> -    unsigned int cnt = 0;
> -
> -    /* Don't count to be released vcpu, might be not in vcpu list yet. */
> -    for_each_sched_unit_vcpu ( unit, vunit )
> -        if ( vunit != v )
> -            cnt++;
> -
> -    v->sched_unit = NULL;
> -    unit->runstate_cnt[v->runstate.state]--;
> -
> -    if ( cnt )
> -        return;
> -
> -    if ( unit->vcpu_list == v )
> -        unit->vcpu_list = v->next_in_list;
>  
>      if ( d->sched_unit_list == unit )
>          d->sched_unit_list = unit->next_in_list;
> @@ -393,6 +377,26 @@ static void sched_free_unit(struct sched_unit *unit, 
> struct vcpu *v)
>      xfree(unit);
>  }
>  
> +static void sched_free_unit(struct sched_unit *unit, struct vcpu *v)
> +{
> +    struct vcpu *vunit;
> +    unsigned int cnt = 0;
> +
> +    /* Don't count to be released vcpu, might be not in vcpu list yet. */
> +    for_each_sched_unit_vcpu ( unit, vunit )
> +        if ( vunit != v )
> +            cnt++;
> +
> +    v->sched_unit = NULL;
> +    unit->runstate_cnt[v->runstate.state]--;
> +
> +    if ( unit->vcpu_list == v )
> +        unit->vcpu_list = v->next_in_list;
> +
> +    if ( !cnt )
> +        sched_free_unit_mem(unit);
> +}
The entire sched_free_unit() is new code (starting from patch 3) - why
don't you arrange for the split right away, instead of moving code
around here?

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to