On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:44:03PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony PERARD writes ("[PATCH 11/15] libxl_usb: Fix wrong usage of asserts"):
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
>
> I'm not sure why you wouldn't just delete the breaks, rather than
> replacing them "return" ?
Because asserts aren't supposed to be compiled in a release build. I
know that's not the case in libxl...
I could replace the assert(0) by abort() instead, they won't be need for
a break or return after it.
--
Anthony PERARD
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
