On 17.09.2019 17:00, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > There is no problem, I understand the risk of having suspicious return > values. I am not hanged on having this return. I used this to skip > adding a new return value. I can do this if we agree on a suitable name > for a new return value in enum hvm_translation_result. I can propose > HVMTRANS_bad_gfn_access.
How intrusive would such a change be? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
