Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] x86emul: fix test harness and fuzzer build
dependencies"):
> you had been particularly unhappy about the v2 approach. While
> not strictly required for committing, I'd still prefer to have
> your agreement with this approach (or, of course, suggestions
> for improvement).
Thanks for the enquiry. I appreciate the chance to comment. I do not
object to this approach.
I think the extra convenience is not really worth the the complexity
in the top-level Makefile but if you think it is worthwhile I won't
stand in your way.
I think it's important that these run targets not get entangled with
the rest of the build system: ie that no non-run targets call them.
If we maintain that rule then we won't introduce new build race bugs.
So overall,
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
