On 04.09.19 15:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.09.2019 15:46, Juergen Gross wrote:@@ -1281,14 +1280,14 @@ void debugtrace_printk(const char *fmt, ...) { if ( strcmp(buf, last_buf) ) { - last_prd = debugtrace_prd; + debugtrace_prd_last = debugtrace_prd; last_count = ++count; safe_strcpy(last_buf, buf); snprintf(cntbuf, sizeof(cntbuf), "%u ", count); } else { - debugtrace_prd = last_prd; + debugtrace_prd = debugtrace_prd_last; snprintf(cntbuf, sizeof(cntbuf), "%u-%u ", last_count, ++count); } debugtrace_add_to_buf(cntbuf);I'm afraid it is rather last_buf[] which needs invalidating, at which point last_prd could imo remain local to this function.
Hmm, right. Will change. I'll send a new series as soon as you indicate you won't have further comments to any patch of the series. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
