> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Sent: 29 August 2019 10:52 > To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > Cc: 'JulienGrall' <julien.gr...@arm.com>; 'Alexandru Isaila' > <aisa...@bitdefender.com>; 'Petre > Pircalabu' <ppircal...@bitdefender.com>; 'Razvan Cojocaru' > <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>; Andrew Cooper > <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Ian > Jackson > <ian.jack...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>; > 'VolodymyrBabchuk' > <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>; 'Stefano Stabellini' <sstabell...@kernel.org>; > 'xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org' <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>; 'Konrad > Rzeszutek Wilk' > <konrad.w...@oracle.com>; 'Tamas K Lengyel' <ta...@tklengyel.com>; Tim > (Xen.org) <t...@xen.org>; 'Wei > Liu' <w...@xen.org> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] remove late (on-demand) construction of > IOMMU page tables > > On 29.08.2019 11:33, Paul Durrant wrote: > > TBH I've seen sufficient numbers of domain create failures when using > > auto-ballooning that I stopped using it some time ago (besides the fact > > that it's slow). If you're happy with the simplistic > > double-the-page-table-reservation calculation then I can add that but > > IMO it would be better to add another patch to just remove auto-ballooning. > > I'd not be overly happy, but I could live with this. But this needs > consent by others, not the least the tool stack maintainers. >
Ok. I'll deal with that later. Looking again though, I'm not sure what you mean by 'the amount reserved for page tables'? Do you mean 'shadow_memkb' or something else? Paul _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
