On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:18:42PM +0000, Zhang, Chen wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Anthony PERARD [mailto:anthony.per...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 9:48 PM > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:43:00PM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: > > What I had in mind while reviewing the v1 of the patch was to remove both > > `colo_iothread' and `colo_compare_iothread' from the libxl API and xl config > > option. I don't think there are useful. Why did you keep `colo_iothread'? > > Oh, it looks I misunderstood your means. > Do you think we just need hard code the iothread name here? > For example the "iothread-1"?
Yes, it would be better to hard code for now, but with a name which better describe where the iothread is used, how about "colo-compare-iothread-1" ? Thanks, -- Anthony PERARD _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
