On 16/07/2019 17:36, Jan Beulich wrote: > At the same time restrict its scope to just the single source file > actually using it, and abstract accesses by introducing a union of > pointers. (A union of the actual table entries is not used to make it > impossible to [wrongly, once the 128-bit form gets added] perform > pointer arithmetic / array accesses on derived types.) > > Also move away from updating the entries piecemeal: Construct a full new > entry, and write it out. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
I'm still not entirely convinced by extra union and containerof(), but the result looks correct. Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
