Hello George,
The patch was also CC'ed to you, but I got:
"554 esa1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com You are being rejected because your senderbase score
is below our accepted policy."
from your server.
ps. I hope I'm not bothering you too much.
On 18.07.19 12:54, Andrii Anisov wrote:
From: Andrii Anisov <andrii_ani...@epam.com>
Using XEN_RUNSTATE_UPDATE mask during the process of copying runstate
values to guest causes runstate entry time to be eventually considered
negative on a calculation of the time delta. So the XEN_RUNSTATE_UPDATE
should be masked out during the calculation of the time spent in the
particular runstate.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Anisov <andrii_ani...@epam.com>
---
xen/common/schedule.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/schedule.c b/xen/common/schedule.c
index 25f6ab3..f4f1a81 100644
--- a/xen/common/schedule.c
+++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
@@ -182,7 +182,9 @@ static inline void vcpu_runstate_change(
trace_runstate_change(v, new_state);
- delta = new_entry_time - v->runstate.state_entry_time;
+ delta = new_entry_time -
+ (v->runstate.state_entry_time & ~XEN_RUNSTATE_UPDATE);
+
if ( delta > 0 )
{
v->runstate.time[v->runstate.state] += delta;
--
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
