On 09/05/2019 18:25, Ankur Arora wrote: > Allow for different hypercall implementations for different xenhost types. > Nested xenhost, which has two underlying xenhosts, can use both > simultaneously. > > The hypercall macros (HYPERVISOR_*) implicitly use the default xenhost.x > A new macro (hypervisor_*) takes xenhost_t * as a parameter and does the > right thing. > > TODO: > - Multicalls for now assume the default xenhost > - xen_hypercall_* symbols are only generated for the default xenhost. > > Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.ar...@oracle.com>
Again, what is the hypervisor nesting and/or guest layout here? I can't think of any case where a single piece of software can legitimately have two hypercall pages, because if it has one working one, it is by definition a guest, and therefore not privileged enough to use the outer one. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
