Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL"):
> On 20.05.19 at 12:30, <ian.jack...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions
> > -
> >> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail
> >> REGR. vs. 135683
> >> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail
> >> REGR. vs. 135683
> >
> > These are a known bug. The Debian "stretch" ("stable") i386 kernel
> > simply does not work under Xen HVM. I don't thnk this is anything to
> > do with the 4.11 Xen commits under test here. It is appearing here in
> > this flight because I reorganised the amd64/i386 test jobs.
>
> Did this reorg include a change in the naming scheme? I ask because
> only the latter of the two includes "i386" in the name, i.e. by the
> known to me naming model the former ought to use a 64-bit guest.
You are right. Hrrrm. I will investigate further.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
