>>> On 07.05.19 at 15:20, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: > On 5/7/19 10:35 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 07.05.19 at 10:59, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: >>> At least on Arm, I don't see any real value to initialize the PDX mask >>> with a base address. I would be more keen to implement pdx_init_mask() as: >>> >>> return fill_mask(((uint64_t)PAGE_SIZE << MAX_ORDER - 1); >> >> But (besides the missing closing parenthese) that's not what x86 wants. > > Could you remind me why?
Because we don't want to compress on the low 32 bits, for there being "interesting" things below 4Gb. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
