On 4/23/19 9:04 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Or else xen_domain() returns false despite xen_pvh being set.
Is this new xen_domain() invocation somewhere in EFI initialization that you add in the second patch? Asking because I am trying to figure out whether this needs to go to stable tree. -boris > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > --- > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > --- > arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c > index 35b7599d2d0b..bbffa409e0e8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ void __init xen_pvh_init(void) > u64 pfn; > > xen_pvh = 1; > + xen_domain_type = XEN_HVM_DOMAIN; > xen_start_flags = pvh_start_info.flags; > > msr = cpuid_ebx(xen_cpuid_base() + 2); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
