Hi,
On 4/12/19 12:16 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.04.19 at 15:25, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
The use of return_reg() assumes ARM's 32bit ABI. Therefore, a failure such as
-EINVAL will appear as a large positive number near 4 billion to a 64bit ARM
guest which happens to use continue_hypercall_on_cpu().
Introduce a new arch_hypercall_tasklet_result() hook which is implemented by
both architectures, and drop the return_reg() macros. This logic will be
extended in a later change to make continuations out of the tasklet work.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
On the assumption that simply fixing Arm's return_reg() would
not suffice with your further plans
I would definitely prefer to keep a static inline function unless there
are plan to make arch_hypercall_tasklet_result more complex.
Andrew, could you enlighten us on your plans?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
