On 18/03/2019 13:11, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Add a helper cpu_notifier_call_chain() to call notifier_call_chain()
> for a cpu with a specified action, returning an errno value.
>
> This avoids coding the same pattern multiple times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
> ---
> xen/common/cpu.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/cpu.c b/xen/common/cpu.c
> index 836c62f97f..c436c0de7f 100644
> --- a/xen/common/cpu.c
> +++ b/xen/common/cpu.c
> @@ -71,11 +71,18 @@ void __init register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block
> *nb)
> spin_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
> }
>
> +static int cpu_notifier_call_chain(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long action,
> + struct notifier_block **nb)
> +{
> + void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> + int notifier_rc = notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, action, hcpu, nb);
> +
> + return (notifier_rc == NOTIFY_DONE) ? 0 : notifier_to_errno(notifier_rc);
> +}
> +
> static void _take_cpu_down(void *unused)
> {
> - void *hcpu = (void *)(long)smp_processor_id();
> - int notifier_rc = notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DYING, hcpu, NULL);
> - BUG_ON(notifier_rc != NOTIFY_DONE);
> + BUG_ON(cpu_notifier_call_chain(smp_processor_id(), CPU_DYING, NULL));
Where possible, we're trying to remove side effects from macros.
Could I please talk you into writing this as:
int rc = cpu_notifier_call_chain(smp_processor_id(), CPU_DYING, NULL);
BUG_ON(rc);
An alternative might be to have a:
static void cpu_notifier_call_chain_nofail(...)
wrapper as this seems to be a common pattern. (Ideally longterm, it
might be better to pass the nofail intention into the notifier chain
itself so we can identify which callback had a problem, but thats
definitely not something for here.)
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
