> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 18 March 2019 10:35 > To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Follow-up viridian fixes > > >>> On 18.03.19 at 11:22, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > >> Sent: 18 March 2019 10:21 > >> To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > >> Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> > >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Follow-up viridian fixes > >> > >> >>> On 18.03.19 at 10:06, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> > Further testing and code inspection revealed some problems with my recent > >> > series [1]. This series fixes those issues. > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-03/msg01078.html > >> > > >> > Paul Durrant (2): > >> > viridian: remove synic poll blocking > >> > viridian: fix mistakes in timer expiration and re-start > >> > >> Is there a particular reason you don't want to fold them into > >> that series? > >> > > > > Only that I believe it's fully acked and so I didn't want to disturb it at > > this stage. > > But the tree isn't fully open yet, so it won't go in immediately anyway. > For the folding in of the first of the two patches here you may freely > retain my acks. I'd have to look at the second patch here in more > detail, so I can't say the same there, but afaict it would affect the > ack on a single patch only.
Ok, I'll send a v8 of that series. Patch #1 of this series would amend patch #9 of that series and patch #2 of this series will need to fold into patch #10. Paul > > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
