> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 15 March 2019 16:17 > To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>; Andrew Cooper > <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau > Monne > <roger....@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; Stefano Stabellini > <sstabell...@kernel.org>; > xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.w...@oracle.com>; Tim > (Xen.org) <t...@xen.org> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 10/11] viridian: add implementation of synthetic timers > > >>> On 15.03.19 at 16:40, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > > So, AIUI the reason you wanted it added was that you wanted to avoid > > multiple calls hvm_vcpu_has_pending_irq() from returning different intack > > values? But looking again, this could easily happen if a higher irr bit gets > > set between calls (which can apparently happen asynchronously) so I'm really > > no longer sure why I need to avoid multiple polls. What is the problem that > > needs to be avoided? > > Hmm, true. Looks like I've mis-guided you, I'm sorry for that. >
Ok. I'll send a follow-up patch to pull it out, and I've also just now found a mistake in the handling of absolute timers so I'll send a patch for that too. Paul _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
