Hi Andrew Sorry it took a while, since I had to check with couple others.
+ Asit On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:39:46PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: [snip] > > On late load failure, we should dump enough information to work out > exactly what went on, to determine how best to proceed, but the server > is effectively lost to us. On late load success, the proposed new > "version" replaces the current "version". > > And again - I reiterate the point that I think it is fine to have a > simplifying assumption that we don't have mixed stepping systems to > start with, presuming this is generally in line with Intel's support > statement. If in practice we find mixed stepping systems which are > supported by an OEM/Intel, we can see about extending the logic. Checking with Asit he says it is in fact permitted to have 1 step behind even on a multi-socket system. One could be N and other N-1 should be supported. Cheers, Ashok _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
