>>> On 22.02.19 at 14:24,  wrote:
>>>> On 22.02.19 at 14:19, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > I have only realised this today: essentially we will end up implementing
> > xmalloc with vmalloc, which at the moment depends on xmalloc to allocate
> > the array of mfns.
> 
> Which (potential locking issues aside) is not a problem, as the size of
> the MFN array will reduce logarithmically, until it eventually is no larger
> than a page anymore.

Err, not logarithmically, but you get the point.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to