>>> On 22.02.19 at 14:24, wrote: >>>> On 22.02.19 at 14:19, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > I have only realised this today: essentially we will end up implementing > > xmalloc with vmalloc, which at the moment depends on xmalloc to allocate > > the array of mfns. > > Which (potential locking issues aside) is not a problem, as the size of > the MFN array will reduce logarithmically, until it eventually is no larger > than a page anymore.
Err, not logarithmically, but you get the point. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel