On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > Hi Roger, > > I gave PVH dom0 a spin, see how far I would get.
Thanks! > With current xen-unstable unfortunately not that far, i got the splat below. Yes, this was already reported: https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-01/msg01030.html > If you need more info, would like me to test a patch (or some other git > tree/branch), > I will be happy to give it a spin ! Paul is working on a fix, but in the meantime just removing the assertions should be fine: ---8<--- diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c index bd1af35a13..98e6fc35e2 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c @@ -321,9 +321,6 @@ int iommu_map(struct domain *d, dfn_t dfn, mfn_t mfn, if ( !iommu_enabled || !hd->platform_ops ) return 0; - ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(dfn_x(dfn), (1ul << page_order))); - ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(mfn_x(mfn), (1ul << page_order))); - for ( i = 0; i < (1ul << page_order); i++ ) { rc = hd->platform_ops->map_page(d, dfn_add(dfn, i), mfn_add(mfn, i), _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel