On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:52:42AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 17.01.19 at 09:57, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > > While not against using physdevop if we agree that a new hypercall is > > the way to go, I would prefer a domctl because this hypercall would > > only be used by toolstack components, and thus doesn't need to be > > added to the public stable ABI available to all guests, even if the > > functionality is actually limited to stubdomains. > > But a new sub-op doesn't need to be part of the stable ABI. > See how e.g. various of the memory sub-ops are restricted to > be used by the tool stack, and hence not required to remain > unchanged.
Oh, then I'm all in for a physdevop limited to stubdomain only usage. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
