On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:20 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > >>> On 01.12.18 at 02:32, <christopher.w.cl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Allocates an IPI-bound event channel on vcpu0 for specified domain. > > Please can such changes to general code be done at the point where > they're needed? > > > Is able to bypass the existence check on vcpu number since vcpu 0 > > should always exist. Bypass is required at the point of use by Argo. > > "Should" is not a sufficient criteria. And you leave open why such a > bypass may be needed. > > As an aside, I question anyway any new interface special casing > vCPU 0.
Ack. I'll take a look at how this initialization interacts with domains with no VCPUs. Agree that the vcpu0 special-case deserves questioning. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
