On 11/1/18 3:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> 11/01/18 11:31 AM >>>
>> On 10/30/18 8:19 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:aisa...@bitdefender.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 5:19 PM
>>>>
>>>> The may_defer var was left with the older bool_t type. This patch
>>>> changes the type to bool.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisa...@bitdefender.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
>>
>> I think this trivial patch has all the acks it needs to go in?
> 
> It being trivial, I was considering to ignore the need for Paul's ack in this
> case (which iirc has not been given so far), but since you ask - did you
> check before asking? I can only re-iterate that generally it is the submitter
> to chase acks, not any of the potential committers.

Sorry, I was not aware Paul's ack was still needed. By check, do you
mean take the recipients list (that I have from get_maintainer.pl) and
match it to the MAINTAINERS file to see if there's no ack from any
particular subcategory?


Thanks,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to