>>> On 07.09.18 at 13:15, <aisa...@bitdefender.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 03:48 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 03.09.18 at 15:14, <aisa...@bitdefender.com> wrote: >> > >> > This patch series addresses the ideea of saving data from a single >> > vcpu instance. >> > First it starts by adding *save_one functions, then it introduces a >> > handler for the >> > new save_one* funcs and makes use of it in the hvm_save and >> > hvm_save_one funcs. >> > The final patches are used for clean up and change the >> > hvm_save_one() func while >> > changing domain_pause to vcpu_pause. >> >> Considering the ongoing problems with the series, please going >> forward indicate here what exact testing you've done to make >> sure you introduce no regressions. >> > > I've tested with tools/misc/xen-hvmctx for xc_domain_hvm_getcontext > and with tools/xentrace/xenctx for xc_domain_hvm_getcontext_partial. > > Before this I first looked at the part of the guest startup when it > calls xc_domain_hvm_getcontext to save all the info. > > If there are more tests that I could run please provide.
Migration / save / restore, as pointed out a number of times before. Plus you of course realize you're free to put together extra testing code, just to make sure you've left no corner cases. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
