On 03/09/18 15:46, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 31.08.18 at 18:22, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >> Add the thread-id to the cpu config data and an accessor macro >> cpu_to_thread(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c | 1 + >> xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 1 + >> xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h | 2 ++ >> xen/include/public/sysctl.h | 1 + >> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> index 057859ab14..f626a6a510 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) >> c->phys_proc_id = XEN_INVALID_SOCKET_ID; >> c->cpu_core_id = XEN_INVALID_CORE_ID; >> c->compute_unit_id = INVALID_CUID; >> + c->cpu_thread_id = XEN_INVALID_THREAD_ID; >> memset(&c->x86_capability, 0, sizeof c->x86_capability); >> >> generic_identify(c); >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c >> index 7e76cc3d68..2c6a40c543 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c >> @@ -247,6 +247,8 @@ static void set_cpu_sibling_map(unsigned int cpu) >> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_core_mask, cpu)); >> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask, cpu)); >> >> + c[cpu].cpu_thread_id = 0; >> + >> if ( c[cpu].x86_num_siblings > 1 ) >> { >> for_each_cpu ( i, &cpu_sibling_setup_map ) >> @@ -270,6 +272,14 @@ static void set_cpu_sibling_map(unsigned int cpu) >> "CPU%u: unclear relationship with CPU%u\n", >> cpu, i); >> } >> + >> + for_each_cpu ( i, per_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask, cpu) ) >> + { >> + if ( cpu == i ) >> + break; >> + c[cpu].cpu_thread_id++; > > No. This wants doing alongside setting of the other similar fields, > i.e. in (at least) detect_extended_topology() and detect_ht(). It > is the hardware which tells us what the thread ID is.
I wasn't able to find the related information for AMD cpus. In case it is in the specs it is hidden very well. > I think you also want to reset the new field in cpu_smpboot_free(). Ah yes, indeed! Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel