>>> On 01.08.18 at 16:50, <aisa...@bitdefender.com> wrote: > On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 07:08 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > On 25.07.18 at 14:14, <aisa...@bitdefender.com> wrote: >> > This patch is focused on moving the for loop to the caller so >> > now we can save info for a single vcpu instance with the save_one >> > handlers. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisa...@bitdefender.com> >> First of all I'd appreciate if this patch was last in the series, >> after all >> infrastructure changes have been done. >> > If this patch will be the last one in the series then between the one > that removes the save functions (and with that the for) and this one > the code will not run as expected because there will be no for.
Well, I didn't mean you to re-order things without adjusting the code accordingly. You will want to transform hvm_save() first, and only as the final step make hvm_save_one() behave the way you're actually after. This may (as already indicated in some of the individual responses) incur changing the splitting between patches. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
