On 22.01.2026 17:47, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -249,6 +249,38 @@ static int (* __ro_after_init sbi_rfence)(unsigned long 
> fid,
>                                            unsigned long arg4,
>                                            unsigned long arg5);
>  
> +static int cf_check sbi_set_timer_v02(uint64_t stime_value)
> +{
> +    struct sbiret ret;
> +
> +    ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_TIME, SBI_EXT_TIME_SET_TIMER, stime_value,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_32
> +                    stime_value >> 32,
> +#else
> +                    0,
> +#endif
> +                    0, 0, 0, 0);
> +
> +    return sbi_err_map_xen_errno(ret.error);
> +}
> +
> +static int cf_check sbi_set_timer_v01(uint64_t stime_value)
> +{
> +    struct sbiret ret;
> +
> +    ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER, 0, stime_value,

>From this name I'm judging version 0.1 is meant. How does this fit with ...

> @@ -326,6 +358,14 @@ int __init sbi_init(void)
>              sbi_rfence = sbi_rfence_v02;
>              printk("SBI v0.2 RFENCE extension detected\n");
>          }
> +
> +        if ( sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_TIME) > 0 )
> +        {
> +            sbi_set_timer = sbi_set_timer_v02;
> +            printk("SBI v0.2 TIME extension detected\n");
> +        }
> +        else
> +            sbi_set_timer = sbi_set_timer_v01;
>      }
>      else
>          panic("Ooops. SBI spec version 0.1 detected. Need to add support");

... the panic() here?

Jan

Reply via email to