On 12.01.2026 17:53, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> On 1/7/26 4:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 24.12.2025 18:03, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> @@ -13,3 +14,10 @@
>>>   struct pcpu_info pcpu_info[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = {
>>>       .processor_id = NR_CPUS,
>>>   }};
>>> +
>>> +void smp_send_event_check_mask(const cpumask_t *mask)
>>> +{
>>> +#if CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 1
>>> +# error "smp_send_event_check_mask() unimplemented"
>>> +#endif
>>> +}
>> CONFIG_NR_CPUS is 64 by default for 64-bit arch-es, from all I can tell, also
>> for RISC-V. And there's no "override" in riscv64_defconfig. How is the above
>> going to work in CI? Then again I must be overlooking something, as the 
>> config
>> used in CI has CONFIG_NR_CPUS=1. Just that I can't tell why that is.
> 
> It is 1 because of the defintion of NR_CPUS in KConfig:
> config NR_CPUS
>       int "Maximum number of CPUs"
>       range 1 1 if ARM && MPU
>       range 1 16383
>          .... ( all other range props are condtional and there is no RISC-V 
> in dependency)
> so for RISC-V "range 1 16383" used and CONFIG_NR_CPUS is set to the minimal 
> of this range,
> so it is 1.

I fear I don't follow: Why would the lowest value be picked, rather than the
specified default (which would be 64 for RV64)? That's what I thought the
default values are there (among other purposes).

Jan

Reply via email to