On 30.12.2025 14:54, Andrew Cooper wrote: > ... to improve the legibility of the following fix.
... wanting to replace the for() with an open-coded form of a loop. Which is fine, but could have done with saying here. > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> Jan
