On 11/12/2025 6:05 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 11/12/2025 5:59 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>> The *-safety jobs are AMD's configuration specifically, and other >>>> configurations will likely be different. >>>> >>>> Give the un-suffixed job an *-all suffix to make it clearer what they're >>>> doing. >>>> >>>> No functional change. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> >>> This is straightforward: >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> >>> >>> I like this and I think we should also rename eclair-x86_64:on-schedule >>> and eclair-ARM64:on-schedule for extra clarity. For instance: >>> >>> eclair-x86_64-allrules:on-schedule >>> eclair-ARM64-allrules:on-schedule >>> >>> It could be in this patch but also in a different patch. >> Oh, that's easy enough to do. I'll fold in. >> >> Given allrules for that, do we want to make this allcode for clarity? > I am happy with that, good idea
Ok, I'll fold that in too. Thanks. ~Andrew
