Hi Lars, On 24/07/18 11:33, Lars Kurth wrote:
On 24/07/2018, 11:19, "Wei Liu" <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:04:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > I'm afraid my personal bar for any such automation is pretty > high: There must not ever be any negative effect from such an > addition. Positive effects would of course be very welcome. I > realize this is an unrealistic goal, but it should at least come > close (perhaps after some initial learning phase). But this implies > that at least in theory it is possible to come close in the first > place, which I can't take for given with the information I've been > provided so far.Then I'm afraid the only suggestion I get for you at the moment is toadd a filter to dump those emails to /dev/null -- you already realised that's an unrealistic goal (at least at the beginning).Wei. First of all, there should only be mail (aka spam) if there was a failure.
This seems a little strange to only send e-mail on failure. How do you differentiate between the bot has successfully tested that series and the series is still in queue then?
Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
