On 13/08/2025 8:12 pm, nicola.vetr...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetr...@gmail.com> > > Since the toolchain baseline for GCC is 5.1, there is no need for > this case. > > Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetr...@gmail.com> > --- > Mentioned in https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/-/issues/201
I personally am in favour of this change, but in the past there has been objection to changing this header it is vendered from elsewhere. e.g. far more could be stripped out if ... > --- > xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h > b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h > index b29342c61cac..d71b9324a6bb 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h > @@ -173,10 +173,8 @@ typedef uint64_t UINTN; > #ifndef EFIAPI // Forces EFI calling conventions > reguardless of compiler options > #ifdef _MSC_EXTENSIONS > #define EFIAPI __cdecl // Force C calling convention for Microsoft > C compiler ... it's noted that Xen doesn't use MSC and I can't see anyone taking the time to make it work. ~Andrew
