On 09.08.2025 20:37, dm...@proton.me wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 12:53:36PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 31.07.2025 21:22, dm...@proton.me wrote: >>> --- a/xen/common/emul/vuart/Makefile >>> +++ b/xen/common/emul/vuart/Makefile >>> @@ -1 +1,2 @@ >>> obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_VUART) += vuart.o >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VUART_NS16550) += vuart-ns16550.o >> >> I don't think files in this directory need a vuart- name prefix. > > Ack. > > Hmm, there's already ns16550.c which is UART driver, so it may be confusing to > have two ns16550s (although in different directories). > > I do not have a strong preference on the naming here.
We have several examples of files with the same name in distinct directories. As an aside - is it really only 16550-s that you emulate? Otherwise the name may want to be e.g. ns16x50.c or ns8250.c. Jan
