On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 11:30:58AM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote: > On 2025-08-04 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote: > > While the logic there covers asymmetric cases, the resulting log > > messages would likely raise more confusion than clarify anything. Split > > the BSP action from the AP one, indicating the odd CPU in the AP log > > message, thus avoiding the impression that global state would have > > changed. > > > > While there also > > - move g_disabled into .data.ro_after_init; only the BSP will ever write > > to it, > > - make the function's parameter unsigned; no negative values may be > > passed in. Also reflect this in svm_asid_init(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andr...@amd.com>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> Thanks.
