> -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Studer <nathan.stu...@dornerworks.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2025 12:25 PM > To: Weber (US), Matthew L <matthew.l.web...@boeing.com>; Choi, Anderson > <anderson.c...@boeing.com>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: stew...@stew.dk; Whitehead (US), Joshua C > <joshua.c.whiteh...@boeing.com>; Jeff Kubascik <jeff.kubas...@dornerworks.com> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Discussion on the delayed start of major frame with > ARINC653 scheduler > > On 7/14/25 11:11, Weber, Matthew wrote: > > > > > As a heads up, since this is a bit of a bigger change then some of > > > the recent > > patches, I am working on running a stress test on it, which may take some > > time. > > > > Out of curiosity, is that something we could plan to run on our end as > > well before proposing changes? > > Possibly. There is some additional hardware/system setup the tests are > dependent on, but we might be able to provide something close without those > dependencies.
We do have ZCU102 available that we manually test against and have started to look at what the Xen CI can do in QEMU. Matt
