On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > With the recent simplifications, it becomes obvious that smp_mb() isn't the > right barrier. Strictly speaking, MONITOR is ordered as a load, but smp_rmb() > isn't correct either, as this only pertains to local ordering. All we need is > a compiler barrier(). > > Merge the barier() into the monitor() itself, along with an explantion. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> Thanks, Roger.
