Hi,
On 30/06/2025 12:57, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
KVM [1] is not applicable here as it starts under/inside Linux, so it
doesn't have direct access to SCMI, the Linux does.
And Linux will see only one SCMI transport (Agent).
Seems, the only option possible is virtio-scmi (qemu) - the virtio-scmi
potentially can simulate multi-channel,
> but this is out if scope of this work.
QNX [0] relies on configuration files rather than the Device Tree.
To clarify, I didn't ask to implement anything in KVM or QNX. I asked to
write the bindings in a way that they are not Xen specific to give a
chance to for other to re-use them. Yes today KVM and QNX would not use
them... But I also still don't see why we should actively prevent them
to use the bindings you come up with...
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
