>>> On 16.07.18 at 23:55, <sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 07.07.18 at 01:12, <sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote: >> > + serial_rx_ring[SERIAL_RX_MASK(serial_rx_prod++)] = c; >> > + } >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM >> >> CONFIG_HAS_PL011 ? > > I had already spotted this problem. I turned it into: > > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM) && defined(CONFIG_SBSA_VUART_CONSOLE) > > It's CONFIG_SBSA_VUART_CONSOLE rather than CONFIG_HAS_PL011 because this > has to do with the virtual pl011 implementation rather than the physical > driver in Xen.
I see. But why still the CONFIG_ARM? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
