On 23.06.2025 09:39, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 20.06.2025 20:28, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: >> Moving forward the idea is for there to be: >> 1. Basic DT support: used by dom0less/hyperlaunch. >> 2. Full DT support: used for device discovery and HW setup. >> >> Rename HAS_DEVICE_TREE to HAS_DEVICE_TREE_DISCOVERY to describe (2), while >> DOM0LESS_BOOT is left to describe (1). > > Considering hyperlaunch this feels wrong to me. Did you consider splitting > HAS_DEVICE_TREE into HAS_DEVICE_TREE_PARSE and HAS_DEVICE_TREE_DISCOVERY, > as I suggested on the committers call? You weren't there, but Stefano said > he was taking notes.
Oh, ftaod: I wouldn't insist on the _PARSING suffix. Having HAS_DEVICE_TREE and HAS_DEVICE_TREE_DISCOVERY (with the latter selecting the former) would be equally fine with me. Jan
