On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 10.06.2025 15:24, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > IMO the added complexity here is not worth the performance > > improvement, not without a clear justification that it's needed. > > Well, okay, I'll simply consider the patch in this shape rejected then. > I don't see much value in wasting further time on it.
The code is already there, so I think there's value in this patch. Did you see my suggestion in the email yo uare replying to about not needing to add the is_iommu_enabled(d) || cache_flush_permitted(d) checks? With that dropped (if it's indeed OK), I would be fine with Acking the patch. Thanks, Roger.
