On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:25:02PM +0000, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > ... and while at it, add missing relevant links to xl-numa-placement(7) > in xl.1.pod.in and xl.cfg.5.pod.in, which describes libxl's behaviour on > NUMA placement.
Oh, here it is. This should be part of the previous patch. I still have my concerns of the option being generally helpful, as said in the previous patch it would be better if this new per-node claim mode was somehow tied with the soft-affinity placement by default. Thanks, Roger.
