Hi Stefano/Julien,

This v2 patch was reviewed-by Michal Orzel on 2nd June. Could it be merged?

Link : 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/patch/20250601163212.2988162-1-jahan.murudi...@renesas.com/

Thanks, 
Jahan Murudi


-----Original Message-----
From: Orzel, Michal <michal.or...@amd.com> 
Sent: 02 June 2025 12:24
To: Jahan Murudi <jahan.murudi...@renesas.com>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>; 
Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marq...@arm.com>; Volodymyr Babchuk 
<volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm/vgic-v2: Fix undefined behavior in 
vgic_fetch_itargetsr()



On 01/06/2025 18:32, Jahan Murudi wrote:
> The current implementation performs left shift operations that may 
> trigger undefined behavior when the target value is too large. This patch:
> 
> 1. Changes the shift from signed (1) to unsigned (1U) to ensure 
> well-defined
NIT for the future: Use imperative mood

>    behavior for all valid target values 2. Maintains identical 
> functionality while fixing the UBSAN warning
> 
> The issue was detected by UBSAN:
> (XEN) UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/arm/vgic-v2.c:73:56
> (XEN) left shift of 128 by 24 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
> (XEN) Xen WARN at common/ubsan/ubsan.c:174
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jahan Murudi <jahan.murudi...@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.or...@amd.com>

~Michal

> 
> ---
> Changed since v1:
>  * Added space after subject line
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c index 
> a19d610178..642407fd5b 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static uint32_t vgic_fetch_itargetsr(struct vgic_irq_rank 
> *rank,
>      offset &= ~(NR_TARGETS_PER_ITARGETSR - 1);
>  
>      for ( i = 0; i < NR_TARGETS_PER_ITARGETSR; i++, offset++ )
> -        reg |= (1 << read_atomic(&rank->vcpu[offset])) << (i * 
> NR_BITS_PER_TARGET);
> +        reg |= (1U << read_atomic(&rank->vcpu[offset])) << (i * 
> + NR_BITS_PER_TARGET);
>  
>      return reg;
>  }

Reply via email to