On 11.04.2025 04:54, Chen, Jiqian wrote: > On 2025/4/10 20:40, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 09.04.2025 08:45, Jiqian Chen wrote: >>> Current logic of init_header() only emulates legacy capability list >>> for guest, expand it to emulate for host too. So that it will be >>> easy to hide a capability whose initialization fails and no need >>> to distinguish host or guest. >> >> Before I (maybe) look at the patch as a hole: When you say "guest" you >> mean "DomU" (which is a common pair of synonyms we use), whereas when >> you say "host" you mean "Dom0"? The latter is not a common pair of >> synonyms; "host" generally covers the entire system, including Xen and >> all domains. See e.g. wording that we use in XSAs. > Yes, guest means domU, host means dom0(or hardware domain?),
We're less strict about that latter distinction - in most contexts dom0 == hwdom is assumed. > I will change my word in next version Thanks. Jan
