On 4/9/25 12:53, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> What would folks think about "wrmsr64()"? It's writing a 64-bit >>> value to an MSR and there are a lot of functions in the kernel that >>> are named with the argument width in bits. >> Personally, I hate the extra verbosity, mostly visual, since numerals >> are nearly as prominent as capital letters they tend to attract the >> eye. There is a reason why they aren't used this way in assembly >> languages. > So what's the consensus here? Both work for me, but I have to pick one. 🙂
I don't feel strongly about it. You're not going to hurt my feelings if you pick the "q" one, so go for "q" unless you have a real preference.
