On 28.03.2025 14:44, Andrew Cooper wrote: > There is a singular user. It's unlikely we'll gain a big-endian build of Xen, > but it's far more unlikely that bitfields will differ from main endianness.
Just one point: While endian-ness in general is dictated by hardware, endian- ness of bitfields is entirely a psABI thing, aiui. Hence tying both together (beyond the latter defaulting to the former) doesn't seem quite appropriate to me. > I'm tempted to simply drop the logic in maptrack_node. If any big-endian > build of Xen came along, that's probably the least of it's worries. As long as it's not obviously broken, I'd prefer to keep such. While it may not be a primary worry, it's still one less of all the worries then. Jan
