[Public]

Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 11:12 PM
> To: Penny, Zheng <penny.zh...@amd.com>
> Cc: Huang, Ray <ray.hu...@amd.com>; Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>;
> Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@vates.tech>; Orzel, Michal
> <michal.or...@amd.com>; Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>; Stefano Stabellini
> <sstabell...@kernel.org>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] xen/cpufreq: move XEN_PROCESSOR_PM_xxx
> to internal header
>
> On 06.03.2025 09:39, Penny Zheng wrote:
> > XEN_PROCESSOR_PM_xxx are used to set xen_processor_pmbits only, which
> > is a Xen-internal variable only. Although PV Dom0 passed these bits in
> > si->flags, they haven't been used anywhere.
>
> Please be careful with "not used anywhere". See e.g.
> https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=legacy/linux-2.6.18-
> xen.git;a=blob;f=arch/i386/kernel/acpi/processor_extcntl_xen.c;h=eb6a53e9572c13
> 7da505a7d4970b1a5b7e1c522d;hb=HEAD#l193
>
> > So this commit moves XEN_PROCESSOR_PM_xxx back to internal header
> > "acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h"
>
> Essentially you're again altering the stable public ABI in a way that's not 
> acceptable.
>

Understood...
I misunderstood the previous comment again...
I'll only move  the new XEN_PROCESSOR_PM_CPPC into the internal header

> Jan

Reply via email to