Hi Jan, > On 17 Mar 2025, at 08:41, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 16.03.2025 20:24, Luca Fancellu wrote: >> --- a/xen/common/Kconfig >> +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig >> @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ config HAS_KEXEC >> config HAS_LLC_COLORING >> bool >> >> +config HAS_PAGING_MEMPOOL >> + bool > > Imo this is too little of a change outside of Arm-specific code here. Just > go grep for "paging_mempool" to see what pretty obviously wants to fall > under that new control. There may be more stuff. The stubs for > arch_{get,set}_paging_mempool_size() likely also want to live in a header, > perhaps even one in asm-generic/.
I’m wondering, since we already have arch_{get,set}_paging_mempool_size architecture specific, I believe this config needs to be ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL and needs to provide stubs inside include/xen/domain.h in a similar way of how ARCH_MAP_DOMAIN_PAGE is done. What do you think? Cheers, Luca