On 3/11/25 00:29, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 11/3/25 05:08, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org>
I didn't follow this direction because Richard had a preference
on removing unnecessary inlined functions:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/9151205a-13d3-401e-b403-f9195cdb1...@linaro.org/
The patch you mention was moving code, which can be arguably different
from simply editing existing one.
That said, and even though the concern is real, I would appreciate to
keep this series focused on achieving the goal, and not doing a refactor
of the involved headers.
---
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
index 7c011fadd11..098fccb5835 100644
--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
@@ -342,7 +342,9 @@ static inline void
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start,
}
}
- xen_hvm_modified_memory(start, length);
+ if (xen_enabled()) {
+ xen_hvm_modified_memory(start, length);
+ }
}
